Recognize This Problem?#
[ Reader Warning: If truth be told, I am not a big fan of corporate blogs. They tend to start off deathly dull and gradually get worse from there. What I am going to do here is just talk about what we've built, because I find it interesting, and then see what happens next. For all official news and, let's be honest, better information, then please go to the website proper ]


Bob writes an email. He sends it to Alice, but CC's Eve.

Alice writes something in reply, then hits 'Reply All'. Encouraged by already seeing Eve on the CC list, she also adds Frank and Joe to the CC.

This is now what we would call a 'Hunking Great Dirty CC Snowball(*)', and they rarely end well. At the very least we have more people not really wanting or needing to see the message, and now all having to go do some work by scan reading it and hitting delete or filing. It's a big part of the reason people get so much email at work.

So what to do?

For Taglocity 2.0 we provide two significant tweaks to this very common email scenario.

(1) We allow Bob to CC a 'Taglocity Group', that people who he works with all belong to, rather than CC'ing them directly.

(2) Bob tags the message before he sends it, i.e. put the tags 'Tags: Project Acme, Customer Issue, Support' on the message as a simple text line.


This now allows for some very interesting things to happen:

- Eve, Frank and Joe can now *choose* if they want to see this message or not, in that they don't necessarily have to have it in their inbox's. They can choose to 'pull' this information based on (a) when they want to see it and (b) how they want to be told about it.

- The tags on the message provide 'context'. This allows the message to be easily found again, even by people not originally on the to/cc list.

- Bob only tagged the message originally because it helped him, in that he knows any replies on the thread that come back will already be tagged for him. I know Bob and he's naturally very selfish, often forgetting birthdays and anniversaries. Despite all that, those three tags have helped at least four people so far.

We did these two things in Taglocity 2.0 because we wanted to 'tweak' the email scenario rather than go make Bob (and Alice, and Eve etc) move the information out of email completely and learn something new. While there are many new great places to put collaborative information, the facts of business life today is that a lot of good stuff resides in email. We are trying to evolve corporate email rather than replace it.

So, how does that sound? Are Bob, Alice and crew happier?

- David

Out of time for today, and I haven't talked about the other new stuff: the Semantic Tags, the Subscriptions, the Invite process and security, the new Machine Learning stuff, the Daily Digest View, the Shared Group Tags, the RSS/ATOM feeds on Searches, the way our on-line service works, and all that other stuff. But I will try to soon.

(*) Actually, we don't, but we could if you like the phrase.

Wednesday, May 07, 2008 11:05:59 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00) #    Comments [0]  | 

 

(Exhale)#
Somewhat exhausted now but wanted to underline the occasion.

We've launched the 2.0.

I've got lots of things I want to explain and have a backlog of stuff to now post, but that can wait a little bit longer.

If we've ever crossed paths before then feel free to email me if you want an invite to get in and play. Being able to spell my last name will probably count enough too. My email that I answer is now: david@ing.name

- David

Thursday, May 01, 2008 8:06:10 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00) #    Comments [0]  | 

 

ALT.NET#

via this.

Wednesday, April 23, 2008 6:40:12 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00) #    Comments [0]  | 

 

Cheep Cheep Cheep#
I've managed to ignore Facebook for so long that it's finally becoming unfashionable. When everyone claims it's dead then I'll update my page (or face or book, I don't know).

I've been waiting for Twitter to die for a while now but it's outlasting me. So I've succumbed.

- David
 

Friday, April 11, 2008 6:22:31 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00) #    Comments [0]  | 

 

MarkMail and Me#
I read this today:

http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2008/01/markmail_opensource_search.html

..and felt pretty good. I hope there is a need out there for this type of app, and reading Tim's reaction makes me happy.

I've been pretty quiet about what we are working on with Taglocity(*) but it's more about just being really busy doing it rather than any clever marketing strategy or devious ramp-up scheme.

Part of me just wants to splurge out how far we've got to so far, while the other part of me struggles with the fact that I've seen a few early-betas interest flail away because they just weren't ready. It's a surprisingly difficult decision to know when to go 'public'. There are worse problems to have in the world I imagine though.

Anyway, MarkMail looks very good, and it's fair to say what we are doing here is in this general area too; although with a bit of a different slant of course.

I can't wait to get out there and tell all...

- David

(*) Our version 1.x is just a tiny part of what we are up to today. Extrapolate.
Tuesday, January 08, 2008 10:58:11 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00) #    Comments [0]  | 

 

FastHosts#

For those wondering why this blog didn't work for a while (on a few levels), then here's an OddJob hat-tip to my site hoster:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7131431.stm

or just wallow in the full horror/news here.

 

Thursday, December 20, 2007 3:05:29 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00) #    Comments [0]  | 

 

VS 2008 RTM#

Not listed as yet, but if you log in you'll see it.

Visual Studio Team System 2008 Team Suite (x86 and x64 WoW) - DVD (English)

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/subscriptions

Just taking it for quick drive around the block. I can't believe we've got to 2008 already, doesn't seem that long ago I was throwing VS2005 SP1 against the wall...

Monday, November 19, 2007 12:40:16 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00) #    Comments [0]  | 

 

All content © 2008, David Ing (david.ing@gmail.com)